Finch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Finch v. State

498 S.W.2d 937

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

DecidedSeptember 19, 1973

DocketNo. 46782

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 498 S.W.2d 937 (Finch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finch v. State, 498 S.W.2d 937 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of reckless driving, under Art. 6701d, Sec. 51, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.; he was assessed a fine of $100.

[938]*938Appellant challenges the constitutionality of this reckless driving statute. We have today, in another cause, ruled on this issue holding the statute to be constitutional. The case of Garcia v. State, 498 S.W.2d 936 (1973) is dispositive of appellant’s contention.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of reckless driving, under Art. 6701d, Sec. 51, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.; he was assessed a fine of $100.

[938]*938Appellant challenges the constitutionality of this reckless driving statute. We have today, in another cause, ruled on this issue holding the statute to be constitutional. The case of Garcia v. State, 498 S.W.2d 936 (1973) is dispositive of appellant’s contention.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

498 S.W.2d 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finch-v-state-tenncrimapp-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack