Finch v. State

64 Miss. 461
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ARNOLD, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion to quash the indictment should have been sustained. It was not enough to allege in the words of the statute that the disturbance was caused by offensive conduct. As a general rule, it is sufficient to charge a statuary offense in the words of the statute, but this rule does not apply where there are in the language of the statute no sufficient words to define any offense. What constituted the offensive conduct, or the nature or character of the offensive conduct, should have been stated in the indictment. Harrington v. The State, 54 Miss. 490; Jesse v. The State, 28 Miss. 100; Sarah v. The State, 28 Miss. 267.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finch v. State, 64 Miss. 461 (Mich. 1886).

64 Miss. 461 (Finch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spears v. State
175 So. 2d 158 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
State v. Needham
180 So. 786 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
Stapleton v. State
95 So. 86 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
Williams v. State
94 So. 882 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
Elmore v. State
81 Miss. 422 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1902)