Finch v. Southern Railway Co.

94 S.E. 1040, 21 Ga. App. 743, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 507
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 7, 1918
Docket8909, 8910
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 1040 (Finch v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finch v. Southern Railway Co., 94 S.E. 1040, 21 Ga. App. 743, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 507 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Upon the evidence submitted a verdict for the defendant was demanded; and the court did not err in so directing the jury to find.

Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed; cross-bill dismissed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur. Action, for damages; from Polk superior court — Judge Bartlett. February 38, 1917. Mundy & Mundy, W. W. Mundy, for plaintiff. Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, Bunn & TrawicTc, Irwin & Tison, for defendant.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 1040, 21 Ga. App. 743, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finch-v-southern-railway-co-gactapp-1918.