Finch v. Hollinger
43 Iowa 598
Opinion
In the case of Kaster & Farwell v. Pease, 42 Iowa, 488, it was held that an action to recover possession of specific personal property cannot be maintained against a sheriff who holds the property by virtue of an execution, unless the plaintiff has prior to the commencement of the suit, given the sheriff notice of his ownership, in accordance with the provisions of the Code, Sec. 3055.
The judgment of the Circuit Court must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Finch v. Hollinger, 43 Iowa 598 (iowa 1876).
43 Iowa 598 (Finch v. Hollinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Pierce
116 N.W. 594 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1908)
Doolittle v. Hall
43 N.W. 535 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1889)
Foule v. Mann
53 Iowa 42 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1881)
Warder, Mitchell & Co. v. Hoover & Co.
1 N.W. 795 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1879)
Peterson v. Espeset
48 Iowa 262 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1878)