Finch v. Hollinger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Finch v. Hollinger

43 Iowa 598

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedJune 16, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 43 Iowa 598 (Finch v. Hollinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finch v. Hollinger, 43 Iowa 598 (iowa 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Adams, J.-

In the case of Kaster & Farwell v. Pease, 42 Iowa, 488, it was held that an action to recover possession of specific personal property cannot be maintained against a sheriff who holds the property by virtue of an execution, unless the plaintiff has prior to the commencement of the suit, given the sheriff notice of his ownership, in accordance with the provisions of the Code, Sec. 3055.

The judgment of the Circuit Court must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams, J.-

In the case of Kaster & Farwell v. Pease, 42 Iowa, 488, it was held that an action to recover possession of specific personal property cannot be maintained against a sheriff who holds the property by virtue of an execution, unless the plaintiff has prior to the commencement of the suit, given the sheriff notice of his ownership, in accordance with the provisions of the Code, Sec. 3055.

The judgment of the Circuit Court must be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Iowa 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finch-v-hollinger-iowa-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack