FINCH, JEREMY L., PEOPLE v

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 26, 2014
DocketKA 13-01140
StatusPublished

This text of FINCH, JEREMY L., PEOPLE v (FINCH, JEREMY L., PEOPLE v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FINCH, JEREMY L., PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

842 KA 13-01140 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JEREMY L. FINCH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D. Ploetz, J.), rendered June 10, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree and criminal trespass in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]) and criminal trespass in the second degree (§ 140.15 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Although we conclude that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal is invalid inasmuch as the minimal perfunctory inquiry made by County Court was insufficient to “establish that [he] understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty” (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), we nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
FINCH, JEREMY L., PEOPLE v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finch-jeremy-l-people-v-nyappdiv-2014.