Finberg v. Robert
This text of 84 A. 369 (Finberg v. Robert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action seeks a fore-
closure of a mortgage given January 28th, 1909, to secure the payment of a negotiable note for $7,500. This mortgage was given in part consideration for the purchase from the plaintiffs of a farm by the defendant in reliance upon the fraudulent representations of the plaintiffs. Upon discovery of the fraud the defendant demanded a return of the consideration of said sale and a release of said mortgage.
This case (No. 413) and the preceding case (No. 412) were tried together and a common finding made, applicable to each case on appeal. Together they sought a restoration of the defendant to his position antecedent to the sale. The defendant set up the fraud in the sale as a bar to the foreclosure. The considerations determining 412 control 413. The judgment finding the issues for the defendant was the necessary conclusion upon such finding.
There is no error.
In this opinion the other judges concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A. 369, 85 Conn. 565, 1912 Conn. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finberg-v-robert-conn-1912.