Finazzo v. Sapir

273 A.D.2d 75, 708 N.Y.S.2d 410, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6609
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered February 19, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ denial of an accident disability retirement pension and remanded the matter to respondents for further proceedings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s line-of-duty report, which contains the version of the accident that respondents urge should be credited, states that petitioner fell in the precinct parking lot after he stepped out of his patrol car and, walking toward the station house, “tripped in a construction hole.” As a matter of law, such fall was an accident within the meaning of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 13-252 (see, Matter of Starnella v Bratton, 92 NY2d 836, 839, citing Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finazzo v. Sapir, 273 A.D.2d 75, 708 N.Y.S.2d 410, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 75 (Finazzo v. Sapir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Pastalove v. Kelly
120 A.D.3d 419 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)