Financiera Asociada, S.A. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.
This text of 530 So. 2d 497 (Financiera Asociada, S.A. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Finding that appellant Financiera Asocia-da, S.A., was not prejudiced by the theories presented by appellees’ expert witness, cf Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So.2d 1310, 1811 (Fla.1981) (“a trial judge’s discretion in determining whether an unlisted witness can testify should be guided primarily by whether prejudice ... accrue[s] to the objecting party.”), we affirm. Any surprise was vitiated by the fact that the question came up long before the end of the five-week trial; appellant had ample opportunity to take appropriate action. Appellant’s remaining points lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 So. 2d 497, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2087, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3922, 1988 WL 91152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/financiera-asociada-sa-v-ef-hutton-co-fladistctapp-1988.