Financial Casualty Company v. Mark Hunt

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 16, 2014

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00929-CV No. 05-14-00930-CV No. 05-14-00931-CV No. 05-14-00932-CV No. 05-14-00933-CV FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant V. MARK HUNT, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F-12-34988-Y, F-12-58322-Y, F-13-33450-Y, F-13-53592-Y, and F-13-53593-Y

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright In notices dated July 18, 2014 and August 28, 2014, the Court informed appellant in each of the above-listed appeals that the $195 filing fee was past due. Appellant was instructed to pay the fee within ten days. We cautioned appellant that if it failed to pay the fee within the time requested, the Court would dismiss the appeals without further notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not paid the filing fee in these five appeals. Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

140929F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Appellant No. 7, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. F-12-34988-Y. No. 05-14-00929-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, MARK HUNT, Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee MARK HUNT recover his costs of this appeal from appellant FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY.

Judgment entered September 16, 2014

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Appellant No. 7, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. F-12-58322-Y. No. 05-14-00930-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, MARK HUNT, Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee MARK HUNT recover his costs of this appeal from appellant FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY.

Judgment entered September 16, 2014

–3– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Appellant No. 7, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. F-13-33450-Y. No. 05-14-00931-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, MARK HUNT, Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee MARK HUNT recover his costs of this appeal from appellant FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY.

Judgment entered September 16, 2014

–4– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Appellant No. 7, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. F-13-53592-Y. No. 05-14-00932-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, MARK HUNT, Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee MARK HUNT recover his costs of this appeal from appellant FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY.

Judgment entered September 16, 2014

–5– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Appellant No. 7, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. F-13-53593-Y. No. 05-14-00933-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, MARK HUNT, Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee MARK HUNT recover his costs of this appeal from appellant FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY.

Judgment entered September 16, 2014

–6–