Finan v. Finan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Finan v. Finan

926 A.2d 666, 282 Conn. 926, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 274

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 5, 2007·No. SC 17918·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 297 (AC 26463), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the record was inadequate to review the plaintiffs claims regarding preseparation dissipation of marital assets for ‘adult entertainment’ and cash spending?”

*927 Decided June 5, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17918. Charles D. Ray, in support of the petition. Sperry A. DeCew, in opposition.

ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 297 (AC 26463), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the record was inadequate to review the plaintiffs claims regarding preseparation dissipation of marital assets for ‘adult entertainment’ and cash spending?”

*927 Decided June 5, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17918. Charles D. Ray, in support of the petition. Sperry A. DeCew, in opposition.

ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Finan v. Finan, 926 A.2d 666, 282 Conn. 926, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 274 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

926 A.2d 666 (Finan v. Finan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related