Finamore v. Upjohn Healthcare Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Finamore v. Upjohn Healthcare Services, Inc.

601 So. 2d 303, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7226, 1992 WL 139015

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1992·No. No. 91-2450·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission denying appellant unemployment compensation benefits. We find that appellant’s conduct did not rise to the level of “wilful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect....” Adams v. Burdines, Inc., 600 So.2d 1233, 1234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Fredericks v. Florida Dept. of Commerce, 323 So.2d 286, 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); § 443.036(26), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission denying appellant unemployment compensation benefits. We find that appellant’s conduct did not rise to the level of “wilful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect....” Adams v. Burdines, Inc., 600 So.2d 1233, 1234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Fredericks v. Florida Dept. of Commerce, 323 So.2d 286, 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); § 443.036(26), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Reversed and remanded.

Finamore v. Upjohn Healthcare Services, Inc., 601 So. 2d 303, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7226, 1992 WL 139015 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

601 So. 2d 303 (Finamore v. Upjohn Healthcare Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related