Final Expense Direct v. Python Leads, LLC

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided May 28, 2025·No. 8:23-cv-02093·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION FINAL EXPENSE DIRECT,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:23-cv-2093-WFJ-AAS

PYTHON LEADS, LLC, JACQUELYN LEAH LEVIN, DAVID LEVIN, and ALI RAZA,

Defendants. _______________________________/

ORDER This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to enter a default judgment against Defendant Ali Raza (Dkt. 113). The United States Magistrate Judge issued a report recommending that the motion be denied without prejudice. (Dkt. 115).1 The time for filing objections has passed. The Court reviews the legal conclusions de novo in the absence of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 F. App’x 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994). After conducting an independent examination of the file, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation and rules as follows:

1 The report cites Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment as Dkt. 70, although Plaintiff’s motion is found at Dkt. 113. 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 115) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and made a part of this order. 2. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendant Ali Raza (Dkt. 113) 1s denied without prejudice. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on May 28, 2025.

WILLIAM F. a2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Final Expense Direct v. Python Leads, LLC, (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Final Expense Direct v. Python Leads, LLC (Final Expense Direct v. Python Leads, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marina Cooper-Houston v. Southern Railway Company
37 F.3d 603 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)