Filterite Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of Maryland v. Tate Engineering, Inc., and the Carborundum Company

Fourth Circuit

Filterite Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of Maryland v. Tate Engineering, Inc., and the Carborundum Company

447 F.2d 62, 170 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 190, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9963

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 1971·No. 15379·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Filterite Corporation, assignee of United States Letters Patent No. 3,356,-226, brought this action alleging infringement of its patent. The District Court, 318 F.Supp. 584, held the patent valid, but not infringed because of differences between the method of construction of the accused filter units and the specifications of the patent claim. Upon careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and oral arguments, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Filterite Corporation, assignee of United States Letters Patent No. 3,356,-226, brought this action alleging infringement of its patent. The District Court, 318 F.Supp. 584, held the patent valid, but not infringed because of differences between the method of construction of the accused filter units and the specifications of the patent claim. Upon careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and oral arguments, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Filterite Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of Maryland v. Tate Engineering, Inc., and the Carborundum Company, 447 F.2d 62, 170 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 190, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9963 (4th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

447 F.2d 62 (Filterite Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of Maryland v. Tate Engineering, Inc., and the Carborundum Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related