Filoon v. Department of Public Welfare

819 A.2d 188, 2003 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 161
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 19, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 819 A.2d 188 (Filoon v. Department of Public Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Filoon v. Department of Public Welfare, 819 A.2d 188, 2003 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 161 (Pa. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Eleanor Filoon petitions for review of an order of the Secretary of the Department of Public Welfare denying reconsideration of a final administrative action order of the Department’s Bureau of Hearings and Appeals that affirms a hearing officer’s denial of her appeal from a decision of the Bucks County Assistance Office (CAO). The CAO terminated Ms. Filoon’s participation in the food stamp and Medical Assistance — Healthy Horizons programs upon Ms. Filoon’s notification to that office that she had received a lump-sum settlement from a disability claim. We affirm the Department.

Ms. Filoon participated in the food stamp and Medical-Assistance Healthy Horizons program. On September 19, 2001, she informed the Bucks County Assistance Office that, on September 10, 2001, she had received insurance proceeds totaling $24,030.00 for a disability claim she filed in 1975. Upon receipt of this information the office determined that the insurance proceeds constituted excess resources and that Ms. Filoon was, therefore, no longer qualified to receive food stamps pursuant to 7 C.F.R. § 273.8(a), or Medical Assistance pursuant to 55 Pa.Code §§ 140.334 and 140.358. The office sent Ms. Filoon written notices proposing to discontinue her food stamps on October 1, 2001 and her Medical Assistance on October 2, 2001. Ms. Filoon filed an appeal of these discontinuances on October 1, 2001.

*189 In a pre-hearing conference, personnel from the Bucks County Assistance Office explained to Ms. Filoon why she was no longer eligible for the two programs. At that time she was given the opportunity to review her case file, the applicable regulations and relevant portions of the Department’s Medical Assistance Handbook. Ms. Filoon reviewed that material from approximately 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The hearing on Ms. Filoon’s appeal was held by telephone on December 7, 2001. Ms. Fi-loon acknowledged receipt of the $24,030.00 in insurance proceeds but testified that she had spent $22,222.37 on various bills including $1,951.45 on medical expenses. Her remaining bank balance at the time of the hearing was $470.36. Her testimony however, revealed that most of the bills she paid were for non-medical goods and services she purchased after she received the insurance payment.

An individual’s eligibility for food stamps is governed by 7 C.F.R. § 273.8, which limits the maximum allowable resources of a person over 60, such as Ms. Filoon, to $3,000.00. Eligibility for Medical Assistance — Healthy Horizons is governed by 55 Pa. Code § 140.301, which limits Ms. Filoon’s maximum resources to $2,000.00.

A recipient is ineligible for Medical Assistance once her resources exceed the resource limit and she remains ineligible until her resources are again below the limit. Resources used by a recipient to pay for medical expenses are not counted once the resources are used to pay the medical expenses. In other words, once a recipient’s resources exceed the resource limit, the recipient must deplete his or her resources on medical expenses before becoming eligible for benefits once again. 55 Pa.Code § 178.1(a), (c) and (j).

Ms. Filoon testified that she received a lump sum payment of $24,030.00 and that she spent only $1,951.45 of that sum on medical expenses. Therefore, for the purpose of qualifying for benefits, Ms. Filoon’s resources remain in excess of $22,000.00, well above the resource limits in her case. Nothing in her testimony or the argument or exhibits in her brief changes that fact.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Secretary in this matter.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of March 2003, the order of the Secretary of the Department of Public Welfare in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merlini ex rel. Merlini v. Department of Public Welfare
931 A.2d 768 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
819 A.2d 188, 2003 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/filoon-v-department-of-public-welfare-pacommwct-2003.