Filmways Communications of Syracuse, Inc. v. Douglas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Filmways Communications of Syracuse, Inc. v. Douglas

107 A.D.2d 1044, 486 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1985

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.D.2d 1044 (Filmways Communications of Syracuse, Inc. v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Filmways Communications of Syracuse, Inc. v. Douglas, 107 A.D.2d 1044, 486 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal and cross appeal unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner asserted that it would discontinue this proceeding to compel the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a 300-foot tower on its property if it were successful in its companion action seeking a permit for a 500-foot tower. Since we have modified the order and judgment in the companion action (see Matter of Filmways Communications v Douglas [appeal No. 1], 106 AD2d 185), and have directed the issuance of [1045]*1045the permit for the 500-foot tower, this appeal is moot. (Appeals from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Balio, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O’Donnell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal and cross appeal unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner asserted that it would discontinue this proceeding to compel the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a 300-foot tower on its property if it were successful in its companion action seeking a permit for a 500-foot tower. Since we have modified the order and judgment in the companion action (see Matter of Filmways Communications v Douglas [appeal No. 1], 106 AD2d 185), and have directed the issuance of [1045]*1045the permit for the 500-foot tower, this appeal is moot. (Appeals from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Balio, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O’Donnell, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A.D.2d 1044, 486 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/filmways-communications-of-syracuse-inc-v-douglas-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack