Filmat Realty Corp. v. Carleo
This text of 186 Misc. 717 (Filmat Realty Corp. v. Carleo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The relationship here was that of landlord and tenant with an allowance for services. There was no employment for wages. There was no denial of the appellant’s testimony that he entered the premises as a tenant and many years subsequently was allowed a deduction from his rent for services. No termination of the original tenancy was established. Rent, as such, continued to be paid. Services were valued in terms of rent.
The final order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to appellant, and petition dismissed.
MacCrate, McCooey and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 Misc. 717, 65 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/filmat-realty-corp-v-carleo-nyappterm-1946.