Fillmore v. At&t Mobility Services LLC
This text of Fillmore v. At&t Mobility Services LLC (Fillmore v. At&t Mobility Services LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BRIAN DAVID FILLMORE,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-661 (JEB) AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pro se Plaintiff Brian David Fillmore filed a Complaint on April 30, 2015, against AT&T
Mobility Services LLC and CWA Local 2236, claiming age discrimination in relation to his
termination from a job with AT&T. See ECF No. 1. The Court previously granted CWA’s
motion to dismiss, finding Plaintiff had failed to sufficiently make out a discrimination claim
against the union. See ECF Nos. 16-17. When AT&T separately moved to dismiss, the Court
instructed Fillmore that he had to respond by January 5, 2016, or the motion would be granted as
conceded. See ECF No. 24. Fillmore thereafter sought a one-week extension, see ECF No. 25,
which the Court granted, giving him until January 12 to file his opposition. See Minute Order of
Jan. 8, 2016. As Plaintiff has still filed no opposition, the Court will treat Defendant’s Motion as
conceded and dismiss the case without prejudice. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order
will so state.
/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: January 20, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fillmore v. At&t Mobility Services LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fillmore-v-att-mobility-services-llc-dcd-2016.