Fillmore v. At&t Mobility Services LLC

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 20, 2016·No. Civil Action No. 2015-0661·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BRIAN DAVID FILLMORE,

Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-661 (JEB)

AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pro se Plaintiff Brian David Fillmore filed a Complaint on April 30, 2015, against AT&T Mobility Services LLC and CWA Local 2236, claiming age discrimination in relation to his termination from a job with AT&T. See ECF No. 1. The Court previously granted CWA’s motion to dismiss, finding Plaintiff had failed to sufficiently make out a discrimination claim against the union. See ECF Nos. 16-17. When AT&T separately moved to dismiss, the Court instructed Fillmore that he had to respond by January 5, 2016, or the motion would be granted as conceded. See ECF No. 24. Fillmore thereafter sought a one-week extension, see ECF No. 25, which the Court granted, giving him until January 12 to file his opposition. See Minute Order of Jan. 8, 2016. As Plaintiff has still filed no opposition, the Court will treat Defendant’s Motion as conceded and dismiss the case without prejudice. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order will so state.

/s/ James E. Boasberg

JAMES E. BOASBERG

United States District Judge Date: January 20, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fillmore v. At&t Mobility Services LLC, (D.D.C. 2016).

Fillmore v. At&t Mobility Services LLC (Fillmore v. At&t Mobility Services LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.