Fillingim v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Fillingim v. State

1915 OK CR 97, 146 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 701, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 13, 1915

DocketNo. A-2202.

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK CR 97 (Fillingim v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fillingim v. State, 1915 OK CR 97, 146 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 701, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94 (Okla. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Will Pillingim, was convicted at the November, 1914, term of the county court of Kiowa county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of two hundred dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty clays. We find no error sufficient to justify a reversal. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Will Pillingim, was convicted at the November, 1914, term of the county court of Kiowa county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of two hundred dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty clays. We find no error sufficient to justify a reversal. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK CR 97, 146 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 701, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fillingim-v-state-oklacrimapp-1915.