Fillet v. Bartolomio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fillet v. Bartolomio

253 A.D. 815, 1 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 815 (Fillet v. Bartolomio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fillet v. Bartolomio, 253 A.D. 815, 1 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to restrain defendants from picketing and otherwise interfering with plaintiff’s business. It is alleged defendants have conspired to divert plaintiff’s customers and to destroy her business. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendants are not members of any union but own and operate barber shops in the neighborhood where plaintiff’s shop is located. It appears that defendants were picketing plaintiff’s shop not to advance the cause of labor but to injure plaintiff’s business by diverting her trade to themselves. Picketing to achieve such ends is illegal. Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to restrain defendants from picketing and otherwise interfering with plaintiff’s business. It is alleged defendants have conspired to divert plaintiff’s customers and to destroy her business. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendants are not members of any union but own and operate barber shops in the neighborhood where plaintiff’s shop is located. It appears that defendants were picketing plaintiff’s shop not to advance the cause of labor but to injure plaintiff’s business by diverting her trade to themselves. Picketing to achieve such ends is illegal. Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 815, 1 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fillet-v-bartolomio-nyappdiv-1938.