Filjay Imports v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 578
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 14, 1958
DocketReap. Dec. 9253; Entry No. 104529
StatusPublished

This text of 41 Cust. Ct. 578 (Filjay Imports v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Filjay Imports v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 578 (cusc 1958).

Opinion

WilsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to [579]*579placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the entered unit value less the addition made under duress to meet the advance by the Appraiser in similar cases covering non-dutiable F.O.B. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage, and that the issues are similar in all material respects to the case of Filjay Imports v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. Rpts. 547, Reap. Dec. 8560.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal to re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the entered unit value, less the additions made under duress to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering nondutiable f. o. b. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 Cust. Ct. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/filjay-imports-v-united-states-cusc-1958.