Filippi v. Sullivan

833 A.2d 467, 266 Conn. 916, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 427
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 1, 2003
DocketSC 17068
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 833 A.2d 467 (Filippi v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Filippi v. Sullivan, 833 A.2d 467, 266 Conn. 916, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 427 (Colo. 2003).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 796 (AC 23136), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs written notice under General Statutes § 13a-144 was patently defective?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Filippi v. Sullivan
866 A.2d 599 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
833 A.2d 467, 266 Conn. 916, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/filippi-v-sullivan-conn-2003.