Filimowicz v. Explorer Transport Inc
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION WIESLAW FILIMOWICZ, ) Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 4:23-cv-00283-MTS EXPLORER TRANSPORT INC., ef a/., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on proposed Plaintiff-in-Intervention LM General Insurance Corporation’s Second Motion to Intervene. Doc. [66]. After a complete review of the briefing on the Motion, the Court will grant it. See McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co., 430 F.2d 1065, 1071 (Sth Cir. 1970); Black v. Tex. Emp. Ins. Ass’n, 326 F.2d 603, 604 (10th Cir. 1964); see also, e.g., Hickman v. Q Carriers, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-0113-RJD, 2021 WL 2207338, at *1 (S.D. Tl. June 1, 2021); Wilke Window & Door Co., Inc. v. Peabody Coal Co., 3:05-cv-0371-DRH, 2005 WL 8173710, at *2—3 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 7, 2005). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proposed Plaintiff-in-Intervention LM General Insurance Corporation’s Second Motion to Intervene, Doc. [66], is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff-in-Intervention has through Thursday, January 23, 2025, to file a proper Complaint in Intervention with a proper caption. Dated this 13th day of January 2025. / | oo huh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Filimowicz v. Explorer Transport Inc (Filimowicz v. Explorer Transport Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.