Filimowicz v. Explorer Transport Inc

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided January 13, 2025·No. 4:23-cv-00283·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION WIESLAW FILIMOWICZ, ) Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 4:23-cv-00283-MTS EXPLORER TRANSPORT INC., ef a/., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on proposed Plaintiff-in-Intervention LM General Insurance Corporation’s Second Motion to Intervene. Doc. [66]. After a complete review of the briefing on the Motion, the Court will grant it. See McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co., 430 F.2d 1065, 1071 (Sth Cir. 1970); Black v. Tex. Emp. Ins. Ass’n, 326 F.2d 603, 604 (10th Cir. 1964); see also, e.g., Hickman v. Q Carriers, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-0113-RJD, 2021 WL 2207338, at *1 (S.D. Tl. June 1, 2021); Wilke Window & Door Co., Inc. v. Peabody Coal Co., 3:05-cv-0371-DRH, 2005 WL 8173710, at *2—3 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 7, 2005). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proposed Plaintiff-in-Intervention LM General Insurance Corporation’s Second Motion to Intervene, Doc. [66], is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff-in-Intervention has through Thursday, January 23, 2025, to file a proper Complaint in Intervention with a proper caption. Dated this 13th day of January 2025. / | oo huh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Filimowicz v. Explorer Transport Inc, (E.D. Mo. 2025).

Filimowicz v. Explorer Transport Inc (Filimowicz v. Explorer Transport Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co.
430 F.2d 1065 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)