Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Filias v. State

Filias v. State

901 So. 2d 1024, 2005 WL 1163305
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2005·No. 4D05-356·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

901 So.2d 1024 (2005)

Jumel FILIAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 18, 2005.

Jumel Filias, Bonifay, pro se.

*1025 Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion for an evidentiary hearing on whether counsel was ineffective for failing to object to jury observing appellant in shackles. We affirm on all other grounds.

FARMER, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Filias v. State, 901 So. 2d 1024, 2005 WL 1163305 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

901 So. 2d 1024 (Filias v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodges v. State
946 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)