Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Filias v. State

Filias v. State

901 So. 2d 1024, 2005 WL 1163305
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 2005
Docket4D05-356
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 901 So. 2d 1024 (Filias v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Filias v. State, 901 So. 2d 1024, 2005 WL 1163305 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

901 So.2d 1024 (2005)

Jumel FILIAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 18, 2005.

Jumel Filias, Bonifay, pro se.

*1025 Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion for an evidentiary hearing on whether counsel was ineffective for failing to object to jury observing appellant in shackles. We affirm on all other grounds.

FARMER, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodges v. State
946 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
901 So. 2d 1024, 2005 WL 1163305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/filias-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.