Files v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Files v. State

556 So. 2d 1202, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 835, 1990 WL 11137

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 14, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1102

StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 1202 (Files v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Files v. State, 556 So. 2d 1202, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 835, 1990 WL 11137 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying post conviction relief. The sworn record before us alleges that defense counsel admitted on the record that he had not prepared properly for trial and that his actions disadvantaged the defendant. On remand, the trial court shall either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach relevant portions of the record which support denial of the motion.

STONE, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying post conviction relief. The sworn record before us alleges that defense counsel admitted on the record that he had not prepared properly for trial and that his actions disadvantaged the defendant. On remand, the trial court shall either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach relevant portions of the record which support denial of the motion.

STONE, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 1202, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 835, 1990 WL 11137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/files-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.