Fileman v. Mooney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fileman v. Mooney

196 A.D. 944

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D. 944 (Fileman v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fileman v. Mooney, 196 A.D. 944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that a cause of action was proven by the plaintiffs which should have been submitted to the jury. It was held upon the former appeal that plaintiffs might disaffirm the contract and seek to recover the sums paid on the contract. [184 App. Div. 535.] This is precisely what they sought to do. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Jayeox, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that a cause of action was proven by the plaintiffs which should have been submitted to the jury. It was held upon the former appeal that plaintiffs might disaffirm the contract and seek to recover the sums paid on the contract. [184 App. Div. 535.] This is precisely what they sought to do. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Jayeox, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fileman-v-mooney-nyappdiv-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack