Fileccia v. Massapequa General Hospital

99 A.D.2d 796, 472 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17187
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 796 (Fileccia v. Massapequa General Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fileccia v. Massapequa General Hospital, 99 A.D.2d 796, 472 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— In a medical malpractice action, defendant Herbert D. Feldheim appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), entered July 8, 1983, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to him. Order reversed, on the law, with costs and Feldheim’s motion granted. It was alleged that defendant Herbert D. Feldheim negligently read and interpreted X rays of plaintiff’s facial injury resulting in a failure to properly diagnose and treat the plaintiff. The record before us is totally devoid of any medically stated opinion that such facts existed or that Feldheim is guilty of any negligence in this regard. All that appears from this record is that following examination, X ray and treatment of plaintiff and following Feldheim’s determination that plaintiff’s X rays failed to show any injury to his facial bones, plaintiff was admitted to another hospital several weeks later, and was X-rayed, diagnosed and treated for such injuries as Feldheim had earlier concluded did not exist. However, absent from plaintiff’s papers in opposition to Feldheim’s motion for summary judgment is any proof provided by a physician as to the obviousness of plaintiff’s injury or that it was impossible that such could not have shown up or been observed on the earlier X rays read by Feldheim. Of significance is the fact that Feldheim was never called upon to examine the plaintiff. His only contact with the matter was to read the X rays taken of plaintiff in his capacity as head of the defendant hospital’s pathology department sometime after plaintiff had been examined by another physician. Absent any indicia of proof of medical malpractice in the opposing papers submitted by plaintiff, in which he was required to lay bare his proof, Feldheim’s motion should have been granted. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melendez v. Parkchester Medical Services
76 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Viola v. City of New York
13 A.D.3d 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Gonzalez v. Sisters Hospital
309 A.D.2d 1277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Anderson v. Lamaute
306 A.D.2d 232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Giberson v. Panter
286 A.D.2d 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Damen v. North Shore University Hospital
262 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Doyle v. Health Care Plan, Inc.
245 A.D.2d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Tropeano v. Astoria General Hospital
235 A.D.2d 532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Lipton v. Kaye
214 A.D.2d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Borden v. McDonald
213 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Masucci v. Feder
196 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Thomas v. New York City Transit Authority
194 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Mosberg v. Elahi
176 A.D.2d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Franck v. CNY Anesthesia Group
175 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Conti v. Albany Medical Center Hospital
159 A.D.2d 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Groeger v. Col-Les Orthopedic Associates, P. C.
149 A.D.2d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Kleinert v. Begum
144 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Burt v. Lenox Hill Hospital
141 A.D.2d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Bills v. Africano
132 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.2d 796, 472 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fileccia-v-massapequa-general-hospital-nyappdiv-1984.