Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Filasky v. State

Filasky v. State

963 So. 2d 960, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13947, 2007 WL 2509850
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 7, 2007·No. No. 5D07-1795·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s denial of appellant’s Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence is affirmed. However, such affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing an amended motion clarifying the nature of his claim and seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

PALMER, C.J., PLEUS and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Filasky v. State, 963 So. 2d 960, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13947, 2007 WL 2509850 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

963 So. 2d 960 (Filasky v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.