Fikrou v. Derham-Burk

32 F. App'x 494
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 15, 2002·No. No. 01-15160, NC-00-01106-RYGR; BAP No. NC-00-01106-RyGR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Guetatchew Fikrou appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his adversary action, which challenged the transfer of property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We independently review the BAP decision. See United States v. Battley (In re Kimura), 969 F.2d 806, 810 (9th Cir.1992). We review for clear error the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo its conclusions of law. See id. We affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP’s memorandum disposition filed December 20, 2000.

Fikrou’s remaining contentions are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fikrou v. Derham-Burk, 32 F. App'x 494 (9th Cir. 2002).

32 F. App'x 494 (Fikrou v. Derham-Burk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Battley (In re Kimura)
969 F.2d 806 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)