Figure Flattery, Inc. v. The United States
This text of 907 F.2d 141 (Figure Flattery, Inc. v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
12 ITRD 2040
FIGURE FLATTERY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-1079.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 11, 1990.
Appealed from: U.S. Court of International Trade Judge Aquilino.
Ned H. Marshak, Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C., of New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Gail T. Cumins.
Saul Davis, Trial Atty., Intern. Trade Field Office, Dept. of Justice, of New York City, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge.
Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, and BROWNING,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the United States Court of International Trade, Figure Flattery, Inc. v. United States, 720 F.Supp. 1008 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989), is affirmed. We adopt that court's opinion.
AFFIRMED.
The Honorable William D. Browning, United States District Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 293(a)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
907 F.2d 141, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11513, 1990 WL 94676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figure-flattery-inc-v-the-united-states-cafc-1990.