Figure Flattery, Inc. v. The United States

907 F.2d 141, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11513, 1990 WL 94676
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 11, 1990·No. 90-1079·Published

Opinion

907 F.2d 141

12 ITRD 2040

FIGURE FLATTERY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-1079.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 11, 1990.

Appealed from: U.S. Court of International Trade Judge Aquilino.

Ned H. Marshak, Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C., of New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Gail T. Cumins.

Saul Davis, Trial Atty., Intern. Trade Field Office, Dept. of Justice, of New York City, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, and BROWNING,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the United States Court of International Trade, Figure Flattery, Inc. v. United States, 720 F.Supp. 1008 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989), is affirmed. We adopt that court's opinion.

AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable William D. Browning, United States District Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 293(a)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Figure Flattery, Inc. v. The United States, 907 F.2d 141, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11513, 1990 WL 94676 (Fed. Cir. 1990).

907 F.2d 141 (Figure Flattery, Inc. v. The United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Figure Flattery, Inc. v. United States
720 F. Supp. 1008 (Court of International Trade, 1989)
Figure Flattery, Inc. v. United States
907 F.2d 141 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
Weslo, Inc. v. Diversified Products Corp.
498 U.S. 897 (Supreme Court, 1990)