Figula v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic
57 A.2d 246, 136 N.J.L. 638, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 290
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Heher, Wachenfeld, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Figula v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic, 57 A.2d 246, 136 N.J.L. 638, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 290 (N.J. 1948).
57 A.2d 246 (Figula v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.