Figula v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic

57 A.2d 246, 136 N.J.L. 638, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 290
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.2d 246 (Figula v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Figula v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic, 57 A.2d 246, 136 N.J.L. 638, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 290 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Heher, Wachenfeld, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.2d 246, 136 N.J.L. 638, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figula-v-board-of-adjustment-of-passaic-nj-1948.