Figueroa v. State

187 So. 3d 369, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4238, 2016 WL 1061973
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Figueroa v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8621
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 2016·No. No. 5D16-274·Published

Opinion

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Alexis J. Figueroa, appeals the postconviction court’s order denying [370]*370his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. He argues that his fifty-year prison sentence for robbery with a weapon in' violation of section 812.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), is illegal because robbery with a weapon is a first-degree felony, punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of thirty years. See § 775.082(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006); see also Santiago v. State, 147 So.3d 1067, 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“Robbery with á non-deadly weapon is a first-degree' felony and,' generally, the maximum sentence permitted by [sections 775.082(3)(b) and 812.13(2)(b)] for this crime is thirty years.”). The State has commendably conceded error.

Accordingly, we reverse the postconviction court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence and remand for resentencing.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, EVANDER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Figueroa v. State, 187 So. 3d 369, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4238, 2016 WL 1061973 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

187 So. 3d 369 (Figueroa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.