Figueroa v. Sanchez

68 A.D.3d 418, 888 N.Y.2d 746
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 1, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 418 (Figueroa v. Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Figueroa v. Sanchez, 68 A.D.3d 418, 888 N.Y.2d 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Due to his incarceration, plaintiff defaulted by failing to appear at a preliminary conference (22 NYCRR 202.27). The only remedy for plaintiffs default in these circumstances is not an appeal, but rather a motion in Supreme Court to vacate the default (see Campos v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 307 AD2d 785, 786 [2003]). In the present posture of the case, there is no appealable order for this Court to review. Finally, we note that plaintiff claims that he made numerous attempts to communicate with the court about his appearances that were not addressed. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Freedman and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Jabuki M. v. Nicole B.
2021 NY Slip Op 04190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Deutsch v. Deutsch
2021 NY Slip Op 03143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Board of Mgrs. of Plum Point-On Hudson Condominium I v. Assessor of the Town of New Windsor
2020 NY Slip Op 1493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 418, 888 N.Y.2d 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figueroa-v-sanchez-nyappdiv-2009.