Figueroa v. McDonough

936 So. 2d 1163, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13994, 2006 WL 2403199
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 22, 2006
DocketNo. 1D06-2732
StatusPublished

This text of 936 So. 2d 1163 (Figueroa v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Figueroa v. McDonough, 936 So. 2d 1163, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13994, 2006 WL 2403199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Circuit Court for Leon County to issue a ruling on his motion to dismiss court imposed lien. For the reasons set forth below, we deny relief.

The case originated in the circuit court when petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus to challenge a disciplinary sanction imposed by the Florida Department of Corrections. The court found petitioner to [1164]*1164be indigent but imposed a lien against his trust account to recover the filing fees and costs associated with the circuit court proceeding. Petitioner filed the motion to dismiss the lien which is the subject of the instant petition. The circuit court has denied the mandamus petition on the merits but, according to petitioner, no written order has issued on the motion to dismiss the lien.

Petitioner fails to recognize that when a final order has issued and relief sought by motion has not been affirmatively granted, the motion has been denied. Griffin v. Workman, 73 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1954); Kaplan v. Morse, 870 So.2d 934 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Quinn v. Millard, 358 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). In the instant case, review of the order imposing lien can be obtained by raising it as an issue in a challenge to denial of the underlying mandamus petition by the circuit court in accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998). See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Petitioner has failed to identify any ministerial duty which the circuit court has failed to perform and, accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

BENTON, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Quinn v. Millard
358 So. 2d 1378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Kaplan v. Morse
870 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'n
720 So. 2d 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Griffin v. Workman
73 So. 2d 844 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
936 So. 2d 1163, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13994, 2006 WL 2403199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figueroa-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.