Figueroa v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Figueroa v. Lavine

50 A.D.2d 562, 375 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12310

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 562 (Figueroa v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Figueroa v. Lavine, 50 A.D.2d 562, 375 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of respondent State Commissioner, dated February 20, 1975 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of [563]*563respondent city commissioner dated November 15, 1974, terminating a grant of public assistance for petitioner and her dependent children. Application granted; determination annulled, on the law, without costs, and respondents are directed to reinstate the grant in question, retroactively to the effective date of the termination. In our opinion the findings of the city agency that it is unable to determine the eligibility of petitioner and her children for public assistance are unsupported by the record. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of respondent State Commissioner, dated February 20, 1975 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of [563]*563respondent city commissioner dated November 15, 1974, terminating a grant of public assistance for petitioner and her dependent children. Application granted; determination annulled, on the law, without costs, and respondents are directed to reinstate the grant in question, retroactively to the effective date of the termination. In our opinion the findings of the city agency that it is unable to determine the eligibility of petitioner and her children for public assistance are unsupported by the record. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 562, 375 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figueroa-v-lavine-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack