Figueroa v. Grant

Fourth Circuit

Figueroa v. Grant

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 19, 2004

Docket04-6909

StatusUnpublished

This text of Figueroa v. Grant (Figueroa v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Figueroa v. Grant, (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6909

BERNARDO FIGUEROA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT GRANT, Sussex I State Prison; G. COOK, Sussex I State Prison,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-609)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernardo Figueroa, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Bernardo Figueroa appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Figueroa v. Grant, No. CA-03-609 (E.D. Va. May 14, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI