Figueroa v. Cadbury Utility Construction Corp.
This text of 239 A.D.2d 285 (Figueroa v. Cadbury Utility Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered February 5, 1996, which, in a rear-end automobile accident case, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.
Defendant’s affidavit, asserting that he was cut off by plaintiff’s automobile, raises issues sufficient to defeat summary judgment (cf., Lenahan v Goucher, 65 NY2d 1034, revg on dissenting mem 111 AD2d 546, 548; Borgesano v Hertz Corp., 69 AD2d 894). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D.2d 285, 657 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figueroa-v-cadbury-utility-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1997.