Figueroa v. Butterball, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina·Decided July 17, 2023·No. 5:20-cv-00585·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:20-CV-585-D

OSVALDO FIGUEROA, ) Plaintiff, ow. ORDER BUTTERBALL, LLC, Defendant.

On October 13, 2022, Osvaldo Figueroa (“Figueroa” or “plaintiff’”) moved for conditional FLSA collective certification [D.E. 44], filed a memorandum in support [D.E. 45] and fecieeion [D.E. 45-1]. Butterball, LLC (“Butterball” or “defendant”) does not oppose the motion for conditional FLSA collective certification [D.E. 49]. On December 2, 2022, the parties filed a joint

Status report on the motion [D.E. 53]. On December 7, 2022, the parties filed a notice explaining that they had agreed on the notice form and consent form and attaching joint drafts of the notice form and consent form necessary to move forward with conditional FLSA collective certification [D.E. 54]. On January 25, 2023, Figueroa moved to amend or correct the motion for conditional FLSA collective certification [D.E. 57] and filed amemorandum in support [D.E. 58]. Figueroa’s amended pleading failed to comply with Local Civil Rule 15.1(a)Gi) and did not include a “form of the amended pleading that indicates in what respect it differs from the pleading that it amends by bracketing or striking through text to be deleted and underlining or highlighting text to be added.” Local Civ. R. 15.1(a)(ii). On January 26, 2023, Butterball responded explaining that the motion was

not an “unopposed motion,” as Figueroa stated. [D.E. 59] 2. Butterball argued that the court should rule on the pre-existing motion and deny the new motion as moot because the motion to amend was either a new motion for which Figueroa did not seek Butterball’s approval or the motion is duplicative. See id. The court has reviewed the parties’ pleadings and filings under the relevant standards. See, e.g., Cameron—Grant v. Maxim Health Care Servs., Inc., 347 F.3d 1240, 1247-49 (11th Cir. 2003); Winks v. Va. Dep’t. of Transp., No. 3:20-CV-420, 2021 WL 2482680, at *2 (E.D. Va. June 17, 2021) (citation omitted) (unpublished); Ceras-Campo v. WF P’ship, No. 5:10-CV-—215, 2011 WL 588417, at *2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2011) (unpublished); Purdham v. Fairfax Cnty. Pub. Schs., 629 F. Supp. 2d 544, 547 (E.D. Va. 2009) (citations omitted). Because Figueroa failed to comply with this court’s local rules and because Butterball opposes the motion to amend or correct conditional FLSA collective certification, the court denies Figueroa’s motion to amend or correct. Because, however, ‘Butterball does not oppose the original motion for conditional FLSA collective certification, the court assumes without deciding that Figueroa meets the somewhat lenient notice standard for conditional certification of FLSA collectives and grants conditional certification under the FLSA. Whether Figueroa’s conditional certification will survive a motion for decertification after discovery is an issue for another day. The court has reviewed the proposed Notice Form and Consent Form attached as exhibits to the parties joint notice. See [D.E. 54-1] 3-6, 8-9. The court finds that the proposed Notice Form and Consent Form are clear and neutral and provide the best practicable notice to potential members of the collective. Figueroa seeks to distribute the Notice Form and Consent Form by mail and by email. The court finds that Figueroe’s request is reasonable.

In sum, the court DENIES plaintiff's motion to amend or correct [D.E. 57], GRANTS plaintiff's motion for collective certification [D.E. 44], and APPROVES distribution of the Notice Form and Consent Form, attached to this order, by mail and email. SO ORDERED. This day of July, 2023.

es C. DEVER III United States District Judge

PROPOSED NOTICE FORM AND CONSENT FORM ATTACHED BELOW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT. OF NORTH CAROLINA 5:20-CV-585-D

OSVALDO FIGUEROA, Plaintiffs et. al, on behalf ° of themselves and all others similarly situated, v: NOTICE OF PENDING LAWSUIT BUTTERBALL, LLC, Defendant.

TO: ALL INDIVIDUALS WHO WERE EMPLOYED BY DEFENDANT AND WORKED AS POULTRY LOADERS/CATCHERS CATCHING AND/OR LOADING DEFENDANT?’S POULTRY, TO BE TRANSPORTED TO DEFENDANT’S MOUNT OLIVE, NORTH CAROLINA PLANT FOR PROCESSING, WHOSE EMPLOYMENT RECORDS REFLECT THAT THEY WORKED MORE THAN 40 HOURS IN A WEEK BETWEEN NOVEMBER 4, 2017, THROUGH THE DATE ON WHICH THE COURT ORDERS CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION. RE: WAGE AND HOUR LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST BUTTERBALL, LLC. I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this notice is to: 1) Inform you that a lawsuit exists that you may join; 2) Advise you of how your rights may be affected by this lawsuit; and 3) Instruct you on the procedure for participating in this lawsuit, should you choose to do so. Il. DESCRIPTION OF LAWSUIT A lawsuit has been brought against Butterball, LLC. (“Butterball” or “defendant”). Named plaintiff, Osvaldo Figueroa (“Figueroa”), alleges that Butterball has violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay poultry Loaders/Catchers appropriate premium overtime rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 a week. Plaintiff seeks to recover appropriate compensation for overtime workweeks, liquidated damages in an equal amount, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, and all other legal and equitable relief as the Court deems just and proper. Butterball denies Mr. Figueroa’s allegations and denies that it owes any employee any amount.

Ill. COMPOSITION OF CLASS Plaintiff seeks to sue on behalf of all individuals who were or have been employed by defendant after November 4, 2017, and who were required to perform Loader/Catcher-related duties, including separating and catching/loading poultry onto trucks, and whose pay records show inconsistencies with the requirements of the law regarding the payment of overtime wages. IV. YOUR RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS LAWSUIT

According to defendant’s personnel records, you were employed by defendant in one or more of the positions included in this case during the relevant time period. Therefore, you may join in the FLSA claim raised in this lawsuit by completing and mailing, faxing, or emailing a signed copy of the enclosed Plaintiff Consent Form to plaintiff's counsel at the following address: The Law Offices of Gilda Hernandez, PLLC ATTN: Rachael Kreuz 1020 Southhill Drive, Suite 130 Cary, NC 27513 Tel: (919) 741-8693 Fax: (919) 869-1853 tkreuz@gildahernandezlaw.com

_____._. Your Consent Form must be submitted or postmarked by no later than {ninety days from mailing]. A first class self-addressed and stamped envelope is included for your convenience. You may also submit a Consent Form online by visiting [WEBSITEURL]. Plaintiff's counsel will file with the court all Plaintiff Consent Forms that have been filled out, signed, and postmarked or submitted on or before [ninety days from mailing]. If you file a Plaintiff Consent Form, your continued right to participate in the suit may depend upon a later decision by the court that you are an appropriate participant in accordance with federal law. V. EFFECT OF JOINING OR NOT JOINING THIS LAWSUIT If you choose to join the lawsuit, you will be bound by any ruling, judgment or settlement, favorable or unfavorable. While the lawsuit is proceeding, you may be required to provide information or otherwise participate in the action. If you choose to join this case by filing a Plaintiff Consent (“Opt-in”) Form, you will be agreeing to representation by plaintiffs counsel. The specific terms and conditions of representation are set forth in Section VIII and in the Consent Form. If you do not join this action, you are free to take action on your own.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Figueroa v. Butterball, LLC, (E.D.N.C. 2023).

Figueroa v. Butterball, LLC (Figueroa v. Butterball, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cameron-Grant v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
347 F.3d 1240 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
Purdham v. Fairfax County Public Schools
629 F. Supp. 2d 544 (E.D. Virginia, 2009)