Figueroa v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Figueroa v. Board of Education

70 A.D.2d 502, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11854

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 502 (Figueroa v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Figueroa v. Board of Education, 70 A.D.2d 502, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 23, 1978, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial directed on the issue of damages only, without costs or disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict to $65,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The damages proven by plaintiff warranted a verdict no greater than the amount specified above to which his recovery should be limited. The court finds no other points meriting disturbance of the judgment. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Bloom, Lane, Markewich and Silver-man, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 23, 1978, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial directed on the issue of damages only, without costs or disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict to $65,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The damages proven by plaintiff warranted a verdict no greater than the amount specified above to which his recovery should be limited. The court finds no other points meriting disturbance of the judgment. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Bloom, Lane, Markewich and Silver-man, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 502, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figueroa-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1979.