Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Figueredo v. State

Figueredo v. State

777 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124, 2001 WL 193849
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-2090
StatusPublished

This text of 777 So. 2d 1218 (Figueredo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Figueredo v. State, 777 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124, 2001 WL 193849 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant seeks a belated appeal of the order denying a Rule 3.850 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We grant the petition as the order does not advise defendant that he has 30 days to appeal the decision. See Cardenas v. State, No. 3D00-2616, - So.2d -, 2001 WL 37727 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan.17, 2001), and cited cases. This cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to treat this court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial [1219]*1219court shall consider appointment of appellate counsel.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardenas v. State
826 So. 2d 1007 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
777 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124, 2001 WL 193849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figueredo-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.