Figueredo Chevrolet, Inc. v. Sabatino

20 Fla. Supp. 2d 165
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedDecember 12, 1986
DocketCase No. 85-373 AP
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 165 (Figueredo Chevrolet, Inc. v. Sabatino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Figueredo Chevrolet, Inc. v. Sabatino, 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 165 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the Final Judgment which held that there was a [166]*166breach of warranty and assessed damages in the amount of costs necessary to convert the automobiles to the particular type of model the dealer had represented it to be. We find no error as to the finding that there was a breach of warranty. The proper element of damages should have been the “market value of the merchandise received as opposed to that which had been promised.” See Carter Hawley Hale Stores v. Conley, 372 So.2d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

The cause is remanded for re-trial on the issue of damages only.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. v. Conley
372 So. 2d 965 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Fla. Supp. 2d 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figueredo-chevrolet-inc-v-sabatino-flacirct-1986.