Figliola v. Ameruso
442 N.E.2d 445, 57 N.Y.2d 879, 456 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3761
This text of 442 N.E.2d 445 (Figliola v. Ameruso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Figliola v. Ameruso, 442 N.E.2d 445, 57 N.Y.2d 879, 456 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3761 (N.Y. 1982).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. Mandamus does not lie in the absence of a clear legal right.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
442 N.E.2d 445, 57 N.Y.2d 879, 456 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figliola-v-ameruso-ny-1982.