Figgs v. Mumford
40 A. 193, 17 Del. 267, 1 Penne. 267, 1898 Del. LEXIS 18
This text of 40 A. 193 (Figgs v. Mumford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Figgs v. Mumford, 40 A. 193, 17 Del. 267, 1 Penne. 267, 1898 Del. LEXIS 18 (Del. Ct. App. 1898).
Opinion
Both parties appeared on the day to which the cause stood adjourned, and the plaintiff did not then object to the delay, but went into a trial. We regard this as a waiver of his objection to previous adjournment, if that were irregular. Wright vs. Hayes, 2 Harr., 390.
Judgment below affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 A. 193, 17 Del. 267, 1 Penne. 267, 1898 Del. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figgs-v-mumford-delsuperct-1898.