Fifthway Realty Corp. v. Sudbury Import Co.
This text of 35 Misc. 2d 159 (Fifthway Realty Corp. v. Sudbury Import Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an eviction proceeding where the uncontradicted testimony and documentary proof established that the landlord had accepted rent between the time of the statutory [160]*160notice of the termination of tenancy and the commencement of the holdover proceeding, the proceeding should have been dismissed (Guy v. Furman, 4 Misc 2d 564 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]).
The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.
Final order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 2d 159, 232 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fifthway-realty-corp-v-sudbury-import-co-nyappterm-1962.