Fifthway Realty Corp. v. Sudbury Import Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fifthway Realty Corp. v. Sudbury Import Co.

35 Misc. 2d 159, 232 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3835

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 15, 1962·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In an eviction proceeding where the uncontradicted testimony and documentary proof established that the landlord had accepted rent between the time of the statutory [160] notice of the termination of tenancy and the commencement of the holdover proceeding, the proceeding should have been dismissed (Guy v. Furman, 4 Misc 2d 564 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In an eviction proceeding where the uncontradicted testimony and documentary proof established that the landlord had accepted rent between the time of the statutory [160] notice of the termination of tenancy and the commencement of the holdover proceeding, the proceeding should have been dismissed (Guy v. Furman, 4 Misc 2d 564 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Fifthway Realty Corp. v. Sudbury Import Co., 35 Misc. 2d 159, 232 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

35 Misc. 2d 159 (Fifthway Realty Corp. v. Sudbury Import Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related