Fifield v. Fifield

Michigan Court of Appeals

Fifield v. Fifield

269 N.W.2d 238, 83 Mich. App. 593, 1978 Mich. App. LEXIS 2349

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 23, 1978

DocketDocket No. 77-2833

StatusPublished

This text of 269 N.W.2d 238 (Fifield v. Fifield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fifield v. Fifield, 269 N.W.2d 238, 83 Mich. App. 593, 1978 Mich. App. LEXIS 2349 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for change of custody of his minor son. We affirm.

Upon reviewing the briefs and record, we are persuaded that the trial court’s decision was neither against the great weight of the evidence nor an abuse of discretion. Westrate v Westrate, 50 Mich App 673; 213 NW2d 860 (1973), lv den, 391 Mich 812 (1974).

Costs to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for change of custody of his minor son. We affirm.

Upon reviewing the briefs and record, we are persuaded that the trial court’s decision was neither against the great weight of the evidence nor an abuse of discretion. Westrate v Westrate, 50 Mich App 673; 213 NW2d 860 (1973), lv den, 391 Mich 812 (1974).

Costs to appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 N.W.2d 238, 83 Mich. App. 593, 1978 Mich. App. LEXIS 2349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fifield-v-fifield-michctapp-1978.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack