Fields v. Workmen's Compensation Board
This text of 556 P.2d 651 (Fields v. Workmen's Compensation Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner seeks a review of the decision of the Court of Appeals in Fields v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, 26 Or App 323, 552 P2d 834 (1976).
Petitioner contends that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Workmen’s Compensation Board had no jurisdiction under ORS 656.278(1) to reconsider a claim which was initially determined to be noncompensable and where the denial of compensation had become final.1
We agree with petitioner’s contention for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Chief Judge Schwab, which we incorporate into this opinion and adopt as the opinion of this court. In so holding we wish to make it clear that the Workmen’s Compensation Board need not exercise its jurisdiction to reconsider a claim if it decides that for reasons underlying the doctrine of res judicata the claim should not be reconsidered.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 P.2d 651, 276 Or. 805, 1976 Ore. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-v-workmens-compensation-board-or-1976.