Fields v. Western Millers Mutual Fire Insurance
This text of 265 A.D. 891 (Fields v. Western Millers Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Schenck, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents in a memorandum. Hill, P. J. (dissenting). The policy had been cancelled as to vendees but not as to the vendors. The determining factor is who paid for the policy. If the vendor paid an assignment may be taken. (Foster v. Van Reed, 70 N. Y. 19.) If the policy was obtained and paid for by the vendees the debt was extinguished. (Barile V. Wright, 256 N. Y. 1.) The complaint alleges that the vendee paid the premium. This is denied in the answer. The order should be reversed and the issues determined at a trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 891, 37 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-v-western-millers-mutual-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-1942.