Fields v. United States

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 12, 2003
• Docket: 03-7011
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7011

RONALD FIELDS, a/k/a Kato,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MICHAEL A. SCHLOSSER; MICHAEL E. LEE; MARCIA G. SHEIN; ROBERT H. EDMUNDS, JR.; DAVID B. SMITH; ANNA MILLS WAGONER; RUSSELL A. ELIASON; JUDGE WARD; CHIEF JUDGE TILLER; JUDGE WILLIAMS; JUDGE KING; JUDGE GREGORY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-03-350-1)

Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: November 12, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Fields, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ronald Fields appeals the district court’s order accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and, under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), denying relief on Fields’ complaint, which

raised claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Fields v. United States, No. CA-03-350-1 (M.D.N.C. June 10, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED