Fields v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
Mitchell D. Fields appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this diversity employment-discrimination action under the Missouri Human Rights Act. Fields offers no valid basis,2 and we find none, for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned decision. See Porter v. City of Lake Lotawana, 651 F.3d 894, 897-98 (8th Cir.2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment, viewing record in light most favorable to non-mov-ant); Melford Olsen Honey, Inc. v. Adee, [601]*601452 F.3d 956, 966 (8th Cir.2006) (reviewing de novo district court’s application of state law). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
511 F. App'x 600 (Fields v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.