Fields v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
This text of 511 F. App'x 600 (Fields v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mitchell D. Fields appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this diversity employment-discrimination action under the Missouri Human Rights Act. Fields offers no valid basis,2 and we find none, for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned decision. See Porter v. City of Lake Lotawana, 651 F.3d 894, 897-98 (8th Cir.2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment, viewing record in light most favorable to non-mov-ant); Melford Olsen Honey, Inc. v. Adee, [601]*601452 F.3d 956, 966 (8th Cir.2006) (reviewing de novo district court’s application of state law). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 F. App'x 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-v-united-parcel-service-inc-ca8-2013.