Fields v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

511 F. App'x 600
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2013·No. No. 12-33827·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mitchell D. Fields appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this diversity employment-discrimination action under the Missouri Human Rights Act. Fields offers no valid basis,2 and we find none, for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned decision. See Porter v. City of Lake Lotawana, 651 F.3d 894, 897-98 (8th Cir.2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment, viewing record in light most favorable to non-mov-ant); Melford Olsen Honey, Inc. v. Adee, [601]*601452 F.3d 956, 966 (8th Cir.2006) (reviewing de novo district court’s application of state law). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fields v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 511 F. App'x 600 (8th Cir. 2013).

511 F. App'x 600 (Fields v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related