Fields v. United Parcel Service
This text of 90 F. App'x 192 (Fields v. United Parcel Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mitchell Fields (Fields) appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in Fields’s Title VII race discrimination action. On appeal, Fields submits additional evidence in opposition to summary judgment. This evidence is untimely and the submission is denied. See Griffin v. Super Valu, 218 F.3d 869, 871 (8th Cir.2000) (noting evidence not before the district court will not be considered on appeal). Upon de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 F. App'x 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-v-united-parcel-service-ca8-2004.