Fields v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fields v. State

410 S.W.3d 267, 2013 WL 5379830, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 24, 2013·No. No. ED 99207·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Abraham Fields appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Abraham Fields appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Fields v. State, 410 S.W.3d 267, 2013 WL 5379830, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

410 S.W.3d 267 (Fields v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.